For some reason I never encountered that when it came out in 1971--probably because I stopped listening to pop music from sometime in 1970 until the early 80s. I heard this song for the first time on an episode of House, MD. Great song for a lot of reasons. It is truly original. It doesn't sound like any other song, even ones by The Who. It is a brilliant early use of a synthesizer.
THE MUSIC SALON: classical music, popular culture, philosophy and anything else that catches my fancy...
Thursday, October 15, 2015
Original Rock n Roll: A Continuing Series
Sure, the music I find most satisfying and interesting is classical, but there is the occasional pop song that, yes, rocks my world. Here is one of my favourites:
For some reason I never encountered that when it came out in 1971--probably because I stopped listening to pop music from sometime in 1970 until the early 80s. I heard this song for the first time on an episode of House, MD. Great song for a lot of reasons. It is truly original. It doesn't sound like any other song, even ones by The Who. It is a brilliant early use of a synthesizer.
For some reason I never encountered that when it came out in 1971--probably because I stopped listening to pop music from sometime in 1970 until the early 80s. I heard this song for the first time on an episode of House, MD. Great song for a lot of reasons. It is truly original. It doesn't sound like any other song, even ones by The Who. It is a brilliant early use of a synthesizer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Wow! That was fantastic!
Isn't it! Pop music doesn't have to be dreary and repetitive. Though sometimes I suspect that the dreary and repetitive makes more money, which is why they do it.
They were talking about this on the radio in France the other day. I had never heard or iit. Apparently it became a hit in early 80s. Weird and repetitive https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH2x5pARGdE
I was a bit of a Laurie Anderson fan back when this came out. Apparently it was partly inspired by an aria from a Massenet opera. But Laurie Anderson is NOT pop music.
Correction: There's no synthesizer in this tune.
Not according to Wikipedia, but yes according to the notes to the album The Who: The Ultimate Collection. Mind you, I suppose it depends on how you define synthesizer. He certainly didn't use a Moog, instead a Lowrey Berkshire Deluxe TBO-1 organ using its marimba repeat feature. It is an early example of a sequenced track, however it was created.
I don't know a lot about music but I knew Laurie Anderson wasn't pop! I was just reminded of it because you said you didn't know how you had missed the Who piece....and I wondered how I'd missed the Laurie Anderson piece, though it's not so surprising since I hate the radio and I don't have a tv. Anyway I'm amazed that you liked it. I thought it was perfect for the musically challenged like me!
Wait, did I say I liked O Superman? I guess I did. Laurie Anderson has a certain uniquely eerie quality that is hard to put into words. But it is definitely interesting. Laurie Anderson was never that widely known, though I probably heard about her first on CBC radio.
Post a Comment