Showing posts with label Julian Bream. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Julian Bream. Show all posts

Sunday, August 16, 2020

R. I. P. Julian Bream

 The great British guitarist Julian Bream passed away on Friday, aged 87. Slipped Disc has a brief memorial:

Battersea born, he dazzled teachers at the Royal College of Music and, after army service, set up his own consort. He was hugely influential in reviving composers of the Tudor age and his virtuosity attracted new works from Britten, Walton, Tippett, Henze and others.  He made copious recordings on both guitar and lute.

The BBC has a far more comprehensive article, with a few errors:

The virtuoso musician performed globally during his heyday, and was renowned for his recordings of new compositions and masterclasses.

He won four Grammy Awards and received 20 nominations between 1960 and 85.

A self-taught musician, Bream learned playing to radio dance bands with the lute his father bought from a sailor on London's Charing Cross Road in 1947.

As a child prodigy, his early recitals led to him being "acknowledged as one of the most remarkable artists of the post-war era", according to the Royal Academy of Music.

Of course, it wasn't a lute that his father purchased from a sailor in 1947, it was a guitar. And while he was indeed renowned for commissioning and performing new music, he was not known for giving master classes.

The Guardian has a rather better obituary:

It was on hearing a recording of Andrés Segovia that Julian’s love affair with the classical guitar began. Though his father recognised Julian’s musical potential, he visualised his future as being with the piano, on which Julian was by then taking lessons. However, Henry bought a “finger-style” guitar (as it was then commonly known) for Julian on his 11th birthday. In the same year he was given a junior exhibition award to study the piano at the Royal College of Music, with the cello as his second instrument.

Although he gave a groundbreaking demonstration recital there, he was asked not to bring his guitar in by the front door. There was no question of his studying the guitar at the RCM – there was no one capable of teaching him. His first lessons were with Boris Perott, a polymath Russian émigré who founded the Philharmonic Society of Guitarists in London. “They were of cursory value and didn’t do any harm, but I had to unlearn the right-hand technique he taught me,” Bream said. “They may have given me some measure of discipline at a time when I needed it.” 

As an important factor in securing the future of the guitar, he commissioned new works from, among others, Benjamin Britten (Nocturnal After John Dowland, which Bream described as “very nearly beyond me”), William Walton (Five Bagatelles), Malcolm Arnold (Guitar Concerto, Fantasy), Michael Tippett (The Blue Guitar), Hans Werner Henze (Royal Winter Music), Lennox Berkeley (Guitar Concerto, Sonatina, Theme and Variations), Alan Rawsthorne (Elegy), Richard Rodney Bennett (Guitar Concerto, Impromptus, Sonata) and Toru Takemitsu (All in Twilight); many of these have become standard repertory. In this respect he made a greater contribution than any other guitarist of his generation.

Very true, that last. The other great guitarist of the second half of the 20th century was John Williams of both England and Australia, but his commissions were few and of little significance. He was more interested in pop/classical crossover.

The New York Times has an excellent piece:

It could be argued, in fact, that Mr. Bream, even more than Segovia, established the guitar’s credibility as a serious solo instrument. He updated the technical standard of classical guitar playing and replaced the Romantic, rubato-heavy phrasing that Segovia preferred with a more modern style. And he undertook a significant renovation of the repertory.

While Segovia, a Spaniard, devoted himself largely to music that naturally emphasized the guitar’s Spanish and Latin American roots, Mr. Bream showed that the instrument was equally suited to German, French and English works and to some of the thorny contemporary styles that the more conservative Segovia avoided.

Even the Wall Street Journal has a tribute:

Julian Bream’s epitaph will not be hard to write: He ranks alongside Jascha Heifetz and Vladimir Horowitz as the classical musician who more than any other defined the musical horizons for his instrument, and his name will always be recalled with warmth whenever a younger guitarist has occasion to perform one of the pieces that he commissioned. There can be no finer monument.

I heard Julian Bream in concert on four occasions and met him personally after one of those concerts. He was so highly regarded that in 1975, when I was an undergraduate at McGill in Montreal, myself and three other guitar students rented a car and drove all the way to New York just to hear him give a concert at Town Hall. After the concert we just drove all the way back--eight hours. But we considered it well worth it because in those years Montreal wasn't on his tour list. I remember the concert quite well. The first half was on the lute and for some pieces he had the score out and lying on the floor in front of him. He made the joke that as he got older, his memory was poorer, but his eyesight was getting better. The last piece in the first half was rather a train wreck and you might say he abandoned it, rather than brought it to a conclusion. Yes, the thing about Bream recitals was that his technique was a bit unpredictable. One night he would be as good as it gets, but another night and he was pretty shaky. This was one of the latter. But the musicianship was always of the highest quality.

One of the recitals I saw him play in Montreal in the 90s was sheer perfection in every aspect. I particularly recall one of his encores, El Mestre, a Catalan folksong arrangement by Miguel Llobet, that was simply transcendent. I cannot imagine it better played. In contrast, the last time I saw him, also in Montreal in the early 90s and I think his final tour, was again rather shaky with some Bach that was both tense and jittery.

I met him backstage after a concert in Victoria, BC, in the 80s, another fine performance. We talked about the availability of his recent recordings. I have met many of the guitar greats, either in master classes or after performances: these include Narciso Yepes, John Williams, Pepe Romero, Manuel Barrueco and quite a few others. With few exceptions I am always struck by noticing that the great guitarists are all about two or three inches shorter than I am. I think that helps!

Julian Bream, along with John Williams, was my great influence as a young guitarist. I awaited every recording with breathless anticipation. With Bream, it was often the new pieces he commissioned, but also his revival of great works by Fernando Sor and Mauro Giuliani. The breadth of repertoire he made his own, for the lute as well as the guitar, was impressive. But in some ways, John Williams was the more important influence for me. His Bach was better than anyone else's on guitar and his integral recording of all the lute suites was an absolute revelation. His concerto performances, with the exception of Pepe Romero's of the Aranjuez, were also beyond compare. Julian Bream was really not a strong concerto player. The other area where I give the edge, though just barely, to John Williams, was in Spanish repertoire. Julian Bream recorded more of it and did so very well, but there was just something magical about Williams' performances.

I think what it ultimately came down to was that Williams, from an early age, had excellent instrumental instruction, first from his father, an amateur guitarist, and then from Segovia. The self-taught background of Bream shows itself, in my opinion, in the stress and strain that seems to underly his performances. Mind you, in contemporary repertoire this works to his advantage as Williams sounds rather too relaxed sometimes!

I studied for a few years with a student of Julian Bream's--he had very, very few private students. From what I was told, studying with Bream was rather like Marine boot camp: first he tore you down and then he built you up again, but it seemed to me that the second part of that process was less successful than the first part.

A final thought: the great successes that Bream achieved, entirely well-earned, are likely no longer possible for a classical guitarist. That is how much the business has changed. A superb performer like Marcin Dylla will likely never win or even be nominated for a Grammy. The wages of commercialization...

For an envoi, one of Bream's great performances, the Passacaglia from Britten's Nocturnal:


Sunday, September 15, 2013

Julian Bream: Guitar Master

English guitarist Julian Bream is about to receive a lifetime achievement award from Gramophone magazine. The Guardian has a big article up devoted to the retired guitarist. I normally like to criticize articles about music in the popular press, but the Guardian is really a step above: their classical music section is quite good. But I do think I can contribute a few insights that the article misses.

Julian Bream has been retired for quite some time now. I believe I saw him in his last international tour when he played in Montréal in the winter season of 1997/98. The first time I saw him play was in New York in 1975 and I saw other concerts in the 1980s on the West Coast and the 1990s in Montréal. I grew up, as a guitarist, listening to his recordings. He was a stunning interpreter of a great deal of 20th century music for guitar by Reginald Smith-Brindle, Benjamin Britten, Hans Werner Henze, Leo Brouwer, Lennox Berkeley and others. He inspired the composition of much of this music. His great rival, the other English (Australian) guitarist, John Williams, was also a close friend. They performed quite a lot of guitar duets together.

Bream was a spectacular performer who explored realms of timbre and dynamics that were largely untouched by the Spanish school of guitar playing. The Spanish players, led by the great maestro Andrés Segovia, generally cultivated a warmer sound. Bream used darker sounds alongside brilliant, crystalline ones for a wider palette. He wasn't afraid to use a bright, naily sound with a very dry staccato attack.

Apart from his performances of 20th century repertoire, he was also renowned for being a brilliant interpreter of Renaissance lute music. We are a lot more familiar with John Dowland as a result of his advocacy. He uncovered some virtuosic repertoire by Mauro Giuliani, the opera potpourris known as the Rossianiana, and recorded some outstanding sonatas by Fernando Sor. There really wasn't any guitar repertoire that he wasn't in command of, though it took him quite a while to start playing the music of Leo Brouwer. When he did, though, he inspired a wonderful concerto and sonata. Bream was a formidable concerto player, with significant recordings of Rodrigo, Berkeley, Villa-Lobos, Malcolm Arnold and Brouwer.

All that being said, I think it is also appropriate, in the context of this blog, to make some critical observations as well. Bream's status as one of the very greatest 20th century guitarists is not to be doubted, but he did have a few flaws as an artist. While I have always admired his powerful and expressive interpretations, I have found him to be a problematic model as a technician. There is no Julian Bream "school" of guitar-playing, even though he did have a few students. I spent a couple of years studying with one of his most accomplished students. He was an excellent guitarist, but like his teacher, not one to be emulated. Why is this?

I think the problem with the way Bream approaches the guitar is that playing is always a kind of heroic struggle. There is no sprezzatura (that I talk about here), no elegant lightness. Everything is done with excessive effort and tension. This leads to drama, yes, but at extreme cost. In Bream's playing this cost was evident in so many of his concerts. About half the concerts I saw him play were nearly technically perfect. The other half had all too many disasters! Sometimes he won the battle, sometimes he lost. Another indicator was his work as a concerto player. To be a really great concerto performer you need a technical confidence and ease, enough so that you can really interact with the orchestra. On the guitar, the artists who seem to have this the most are John Williams and Pepe Romero. Bream never seemed entirely relaxed when playing with orchestra--probably because he was never that relaxed ever with the guitar!

Sometimes this tension can lead to a mannered performance. His recording of the Choro No. 1 by Heitor Villa-Lobos is an example. It is so choppy, naily and overblown that it permanently turned me off the piece. Here is the performance:


Villa-Lobos seems to be the one composer that Bream does not play well. No, wait, there is another: J. S. Bach. Bream did not record a great deal of Bach, but when he did that same tension and excess tends to mar the performance:


Flat-footed, rhythmically stiff, skittish tempo, clumsy phrases--there is not a lot to like in that performance.

But all that being said, we should admire the lifetime achievement of Julian Bream for the great one it was. When he started out there was no English classical guitar tradition. After a few decades of his influence as a concert artist and inspiration to composers, Great Britain is now a center of outstanding guitar playing. Artists like John Williams, David Russell and a host of others would likely never have achieved the heights they did were it not for the pioneering career of Julian Bream.

Let's end with a performance of the Fandango by Joaquin Rodrigo, an example of Bream at his incisive best:


Unfortunately it is not available on YouTube, but Bream's recording of the rest of those Tres Piezas Españoles by Rodrigo, especially of the Passacaglia, showed we guitarists how they should be played!

Thank you very much, Julian!

Monday, July 15, 2013

Happy Birthday, Julian!

Today is Julian Bream's 80th birthday and he is probably tending his roses at his country place in Wiltshire. Norman Lebrecht has a tribute to him. Of course, Julian Bream was not at all shy and in fact did not suffer fools gladly. I have met him on a couple of occasions--just brief encounters after a concert. Here is a lovely performance of a lovely piece of music written for him. At the end we see the composer, William Walton, another musician who tended to the acerbic, who compliments him on getting it "better". Ah, the English!


I first saw Julian Bream in a concert in New York at Town Hall in 1975. The first half was played on the lute and the second, guitar. I was both impressed with the power of his expression and disappointed at his occasional struggles with the instrument. As I recall, the first half ended with a piece by Dowland that just fell apart. He didn't actually end the piece, he abandoned it!

A number of years later, I saw him play at Place des Arts in Montréal and it was just as expressive, but this time technically impeccable. One of his encores, the "El Mestre" of Miguel Llobet, was as fine a performance on guitar as I have ever heard. Alas, I can't find it on YouTube, but here he is playing another piece by Llobet, "El Testament de Amelia":


I also saw his final tour before retiring in 1997/98. It was an excellent program with a big suite by Bach and a Sonata by Brouwer. But as I recall, it was again plagued by some struggles with the instrument. A couple of things people have said about Bream: a friend of mine and ex-student of Bream's said that every concert was like an heroic battle. And John Duarte has said that yes, on occasion Bream makes mistakes in concert, but he would still rather hear Bream make a few mistakes than just about anyone else play all the right notes! I think I would agree with that.

Julian Bream is a serious guitarist who took a very serious approach to the music. He commissioned and performed the most demanding music and did a fantastic job playing it. I think that the audience, in later years, became a little less knowledgeable and less able to appreciate his caliber of musicianship. His last few tours had lower attendance than before. But few guitarists had the musical depth and command of the instrument that Julian Bream had. Perhaps none...

Here are Julian Bream and John Williams with a nicely spectacular performance of a piece by Isaac Albéniz:


Friday, September 30, 2011

200th Post

I just noticed this is the 200th post and I thought it was time I thanked my readers (who are also listeners thanks to the magic of YouTube and the Internet) and especially that small, select band of commentors who seem to be the most knowledgeable and polite on the web.

I just started this blog in June 2011, four months ago, and starting from zero, my readership has grown until now I estimate that I am being read in thirty or forty countries. Music may not be a universal language, but it is one that inspires universal interest. My readership is select, that is to say, small, but it seems to be growing and growing. I have had one Instalaunch (so far) which is what happens when the Blogfather, Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit links to you: my readership multiplied by 100 times instantly.

If you read all of this blog, you might get a bit of a sense of what is going on now in music, a little music history and theory, lots of talk about composers like Bach and Beethoven, critiques of other composers, praise of the Beatles and critiques of most other pop music, discussion of issues of performance and composition and a little of my own career in music.

Interesting and entertaining, all of it! And speaking of interesting and entertaining:


Julian Bream, improvising with the sarod player Ali Akbar Khan in 1963. This was at least two years before George Harrison discovered Indian music!