The Italian-born composer-pianist Ferruccio Busoni was a clairvoyant who will never cease to magnetize a coterie of adherents. In his Sketch of a New Esthetic of Music (1907), Busoni proposed the notion of “Ur-Musik.” It is an elemental realm of absolute music in which composers have approached the “true nature of music” by discarding traditional templates. Sonata form, since the times of Haydn and Mozart a basic organizing principle governed by goal-directed harmonies, would be no more.
An example?
Encountering Adams’s Become Ocean on a 21st-century symphonic program is so fundamentally enthralling that it risks cliché. It is the proverbial oasis in the desert. The Sahara here is contemporary American concert music inscribed in sand. The ocean Adams supplies is equally physical and metaphysical. Its tides heave and recede. In place of tunes, it proposes shifting modulations of texture, pulse, and harmony. The harmonies are triadic but barely directional; they shimmer atop anchoring brass choirs.
Read the whole essay which covers a lot of ground
* * *
A remarkable concert on the river Thames:
Travelers coming to London by sea were sometimes surprised when their sailing ships anchored at the mouth of the Thames and then simply waited—not for a shift in the wind but for a change in the water. Depending on the hour, the river flowed either forward or backward, pushed along by the estuarial tide, carrying lost boots, schools of pike and carp, occasionally corpses, and just now royals and nobility headed toward supper and an evening’s entertainment at a garden villa upstream in Chelsea. Early the next morning, with the water returned to its normal state, George floated back home and allowed everyone finally to retire to bed.
Two days later, when a newspaper gave an account of the outing, the most remarkable thing was reckoned to be not the king and his mobile court, swept along by a reversible river, but rather “the finest Symphonies, compos’d express for this Occasion,” and the German who had written them. He was thirty-two years old, graced with a royal pension, and comfortable in four languages. He was said to have survived a sword thrust when an opponent’s blade landed on a button. He had attached himself to dukes who became princes and princes who became kings. It would take the better part of a century for other people to rearrange his latest work, composed in bright major keys built for the outdoors, and drag it into a concert hall. Its title, Water Music, would forever carry a whiff of cow parsley and river mud. But chroniclers were already calling him “the famous Mr. Hendel,” and on this splendid July evening, a few months into his thirty-third year, he had every reason to believe one obvious thing: the right river, taken at the flood, could work miracles.
* * *
Ancient Greek and Roman art tends to look really good today.
This is not a universal rule. The Greeks weren’t always the masters of naturalism that we know: early Archaic kouroi now seem rather stilted and uneasy. As in all societies, cruder work was produced at the lower end of the market. Art in the peripheral provinces of the Roman Empire was often clearly a clumsy imitation of work at the center. Even so, modern viewers tend to be struck by the excellence of Greek and Roman art. The examples I have given here are far from exceptions. Explore the Naples Archaeological Museum, the British Museum, the Louvre, or the Metropolitan Museum and you will see that they had tons of this stuff. Still more remarkable, in a way, is the abundance of good work discovered in Pompeii, a provincial town of perhaps 15,000 people.
Here is another Roman statue, this time depicting the Emperor Augustus. It is called the Augustus of the Prima Porta after the site where it was discovered. Something interesting about this statue is that traces of paint survive on its surface. This is because, like most though not all ancient statues, it was originally painted.
You really have to read the whole thing for a fascinating argument that the reason that our attempts to paint ancient statues come out looking so horrible is because we are doing it wrong.
* * *
Bachtrack’s Classical Music Statistics 2025
Just picking out some interesting tidbits:
In 2025, Yannick Nézet-Séguin tops our list of busiest conductors, with an amazing 120 listed engagements – and looking back over the last decade of data, Nézet-Séguin has been a consistent presence among the busiest.
European orchestras are similar in their distance travelled. The Berliner Philharmoniker, Wiener Philharmoniker and Budapest Festival Orchestra all visited 11 countries in 2025. Their raw number of total listed performances are notable too – 137, 132 and 100 respectively, including concerts in their home bases, though the Leipzig Gewandhausorchester outpaced them with 187, visiting 8 countries outside Germany.
In the last decade, we have seen a steady rise of Maurice Ravel in our listings. 2025 marked the composer’s 150th anniversary, so it is no surprise to see his pieces in among the most performed concert works, La Valse and the Piano Concerto in G major both placing within the top five.
I didn't see statistics for most active soloists which would have been interesting.
* * *
Now let's have some musical envois, Let's start with Become Ocean and work up from there.
4 comments:
Strange that that article on sculpture painting has absolutely no mention of India or Hinduism. When painting on Greek statues is discussed, reference is very typically made to Hindu tradition that continues to employ statues in religious worship and paint them to this day, and that Indian statuary has influenced the choice of colors in Greek reconstruction attempts. It does seem rather insensitive to call such colors “awful” when they’re perfectly delicious to millions of devotees today.
the Horowitz essay covered a lot of ground, yes, but it came off as weirdly lacking in focus. It managed to be less than the sum of its parts, most of which were interesting reading. I've been underwhelmed by Horowitz's books in the last five years and I guess I'd have to say it's because he has a big idea or big ideas and tries to connect them all. Dvorak's Prophecy was fine and the book on the jingoistic nationalist streak he detected, in all people, JFK regarding arts policy was ... polemical. I'm not sure I agree with Douglas Shadle slamming Horowitz, exactly, but Horowitz seems to have been a few drafts away from what Ur-Music is supposed to do. Either that or he may be retroactively imputing it to figures where it's just not that historically cogent. I get Taruskin's take on Ives as an unreconstructed maximalist whose work is understood as a massive counterfactual thought experiment in which the United States actually ever lived up to its on-paper political ideals, but with Horowitz I'm not so sure. Still, I do have Horowitz to thank for introducing me to Arthur Farwell, and I think Horowitz is basically right to contend that to dismiss him as a cultural appropriator because he was a landmark Indianist is really unfair. Farwell cultivated relationships with the tribes whose music he transcribed and in that sense he had way, way closer connections to Native American groups than Samuel Coleridge-Taylor did when he was composing the Hiawatha cantata (not that I'm ripping on the Hiawatha Cantata cycle, I actually kinda like it).
But the connections between figures like Busoni, Schoenberg, Ives, Farwell and so on seemed alternately forced or nebulous. Still, Horowitz' stream-of-consciousness made for okay reading.
okay, for regulars that last comment was me and even if it seems too obvious I thought I'd clarify.
I haven't heard "Become Ocean" yet, I may have to get around to it.
such as it is, I finally finished another installment in the Matiegka analysis project but I stuck to the first movement of Op. 23, which is a transformative transcription of Haydn's B minor piano sonata
Post a Comment