Sunday, March 12, 2023

The Deep Roots of Aesthetics

I got a new pen the other day, a Visconti, designed and made in Florence. It is quite beautiful and the body is fluted, meaning it has shallow channels along the length:


Now the idea of fluting goes way, way back. As the Wikipedia article shows, it was common for Greek columns to be fluted:


But the idea didn't originate with them. They borrowed ideas about column design from the Egyptians who had quite a variety of designs:


They borrowed ideas from nature, specifically bundles of papyrus stalks, lotus buds and palms. Originally there were probably columns made from actual papyrus bound together in bundles and a fluted column just echoes that. The Greeks didn't have these plants, so they just copied the Egyptian columns, making them more simple and, to our eyes, classic. This idea has never really gone away even four or more thousand years later. Here is the facade of the US Supreme Court:


So, architecture has some very, very deep roots! What about music? Unfortunately, we don't have records in stone going back millennia as there are in architecture. The few examples of Greek notation, carved in stone, give us mere hints as to the melodic content and less of the rhythmic and harmonic content. That doesn't stop people from re-creating versions of ancient Greek music, but we can't be sure how authentic they are. Still, the idea of an open fifth drone must be ancient. Whether or not you believe Pythagoras actually existed, the school associated with him was very aware of the basic musical intervals and the idea that they would have been combined for an accompaniment to melody is likely.

I'm not sure if there is much research on this, but I have a feeling that there are a lot of musical ideas that are really ancient. Here is some of the oldest European polyphony, from the St. Martial manuscript:


UPDATE: I thought of another deep root of aesthetics with some musical connection: the poetic "foot" that comes down to us from ancient times. A related concept is that of arsis and thesis or upbeat and downbeat. Just how old these patterns are is suggested by the names: dactyl, anapest, bacchius and cretic. And being basic rhythmic patterns they are still in use today. In fact, in my analyses of Shostakovich string quartets I found a number of occasions where he uses a pattern like the dactyl to unify a whole movement.

An important early source is Aristoxenus of Tarentum, a pupil of Aristotle, who wrote many volumes on harmony, rhythm and music.

3 comments:

Steven said...

Interesting! There seems to be a lot of study into ancient music at the moment and various performances recreating it. Often rather speculative but nonetheless interesting.

Will Wilkin said...

In their book Philosophy In The Flesh, Lakoff and Johnson argue that most "cognition" is subliminal or unconscious and ultimately somatic, and that most language and elementary ideas are based on bodily sensations, of movement, temperature, sound, etc. Bodily experience and the senses are the primary elements of more abstract thought, and give us the bases for the metaphors that is all language and by which we convey thought.

Music seems to me to be a parallel of language, a non-literal and therefore even more abstract conveyance of the sensations of life, rooted in the impulses of the beating heart and thumping foot, and pronouncing a range of emotional and aesthetic importances in melody of every nuance. After all, there isn't really any music of the spheres, it comes from life with its drives and strivings, whether bird or man.

Bryan Townsend said...

Yeah, Aristotle was all wet when it came to things like the super- and sub-lunary spheres. Good point that there is likely a somatic root to so much musical structure. This might be one reason why some of the more abstract musical structures like total serialism, don't seem to have as much traction with the listener.