Friday, April 15, 2022

Friday Miscellanea

Sometimes I wish I lived in Europe: One Opera, Three Acts, Three Different Stagings. I still have not heard any Wagner opera in an actual opera house and this looks like an interesting bet.

Each of the three acts in [Stuttgart State Opera's] new production of “Die Walküre,” the second opera in Wagner’s tetralogy, which opens on Sunday, has a highly different staging, each devised by a different creative team.

Three unrelated interpretations, overseen by three groups of directors and designers, performed by one cast and one orchestra, for a single audience. Cornelius Meister, the company’s music director, said the term used in-house to describe the situation is “multi-perspectival.” But it’s also been a grand juggling act, with overlapping rehearsals, many rounds of costume fittings and a mounting air of suspense, with the company only getting a clear sense of how — or if — the acts might coalesce at the first full dress rehearsal, two weeks before the premiere.

* * *

I was thinking more about Marin Alsop's Beethoven 9th project: Marin’s Ode to Joy

The thing that always struck me about the symphony is that you have the sense that the listeners are enduring the first three movements in order to get to the choir. People didn’t understand that the way Beethoven opens the symphony impacts the way he ends it. It’s an arc. It’s a whole story. I want people to understand the narrative.

I have to admit to a bit of skepticism when conductors go off on projects like this--is the main goal simply pumping up one's career or are some real revelations to be presented? If listeners are indeed squirming in their seats waiting for the choir to come it, it is undoubtedly either because of pre-concert publicity or, more likely, because a hundred or so singers have been sitting silently at the back for almost an hour. I can't think of any musical reason why. And I'm trying to understand what she means by "the way Beethoven opens the symphony impacts the way he ends it." This kind of mysterious opening had been done many times, especially by Haydn in his oratorio The Creation as well as some slow introductions to symphonies.

* * *

And Alex Ross has another excellent piece in The New Yorker, this time a review of the superb ensemble The L.A. Master Chorale’s Pyramids of Sound. A typical paragraph:

No less stirring was a performance of Frank Martin’s Mass for Double Choir, in February. This was under the direction of Jenny Wong, the Master Chorale’s associate artistic director, who wrote a dissertation about Martin’s choral music. The Mass was composed in the nineteen-twenties but withheld from circulation for decades; Martin explained that he had considered the piece “a matter between God and myself.” Wong has identified clandestine allusions to Bach’s B-Minor Mass, especially in the Agnus Dei. Her scholarly insights no doubt contributed to a rendition that was pristine in sound and purposeful in motion.

* * * 

Here is another take on this important issue: Fake artists are what happens when fandom dies It's a long and complex discussion, but here are some highlights:

Streaming music soundtracks our everyday lives. There are playlists for everything we do (study, fitness, relaxing, cooking, working, etc.). By becoming pervasive, music has lost some of its magic. The fandom that was inherent in people buying music because they loved it is gone. The biproduct of ubiquity is utility. In the immortal words of Syndrome from the Incredibles: “When everyone is super, no one will be…”

The problem is that, from the ground up, Western streaming is geared for consumption not fandom. From playlists through to economics, streaming is all about consumption at scale. Songs fuel consumption, not artists. Which is the breeding ground for mood music, of which ‘fake artists’ are but one sub-strand. 

In fact, mood music is the natural evolution of a consumption-first system. A system in which artists get washed away by streaming’s torrent of ubiquity. 

Add poor remuneration for mid and long-tail artists into the mix, and you have a perfect storm. Why? Because artists are compelled to diversify their income mix to eke out every extra dollar they can get from their creativity, with production music libraries being eager customers of their ancillary work.

What strikes me here is that we seem to be at the other end of a long, historic era, the beginning of which is around 1500. Music printing did things like reify music, turn it into a physical product that could be purchased and easily disseminated. One of the earliest beneficiaries was the composer Josquin des Prez who became widely famous through printed volumes of his music. He was the first example of the creation of a musical legend as stories of his genius and personality accumulated and were disseminated along with the music. Now we seem to be at the end of that era when the individuality, character and creativity of artists seems to be being leached away into the anonymous stream of "mood music."

* * * 

But we still have some rich musical personalities and The Guardian reviewed concerts by two of them. Igor Levit gave two concerts devoted to the repertoire on his recent CD that we reviewed here and guitarist Sean Shibe gave a spectacularly varied guitar recital:

The Edinburgh-born virtuoso Sean Shibe opened his recital – entitled “Baroque meets Minimalism” – with a selection from the Scottish lute manuscripts of the 17th century, remade in this guitarist’s own subtly ornamented and poetic fashion. In Bach’s lute Suite in E minor, BWV 996, every twist of counterpoint, each voice, was clear and unforced. For this part of the recital, Shibe used an instrument made by Simon Ambridge in 2011, a copy of the classic Hauser played by pioneer guitarists of the past, Segovia and Julian Bream.

He then switched to electric guitar, first to the cutaway Fender Stratocaster, then to a PRS Custom 24-08. You need to be an insider to appreciate the different specs, but enjoying the variety is part of the Shibe experience. Messiaen’s motet O sacrum convivium (1937) was freshly ecstatic, resonating around the building. In Pushing my thumb through a plate by Oliver Leith (b1990), originally for harp, now in a new version for guitar, Shibe used the tuning pegs to whoop slowly in and out of aural focus, a meditation on flux and inconstancy.

* * * 

How about some music? Here is the Ride of the Valkyries from Wagner's Die Walküre in a 2019 production at the Met:

Another of the pieces in that choral concert was the Te Deum by Arvo Pärt:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VU7TVEscPcc

And let's have some Josquin des Prez as well, Here is his justly famous Missa Pange Lingua:


13 comments:

Ethan Hein said...

Ted Gioia is a terrific writer, but a sociologist he is not. He has certainly picked up on a trend, but he doesn't have a whole lot of data to support some of his gut-level intuition. The existence of Spotify scammers and the easy availability of mood music does not support a conclusion about the end of fandom. If we're going on the kind of anecdotal observation that Gioia is using, I could counter with my daily interactions with college kids over the last ten years. Streaming services have come and gone during that time but their basic musical behaviors (including intense, identity-defining fandoms) remain constant.

Bryan Townsend said...

I'm not a user of streaming services myself and the first I heard of this issue was last week when I read Ted Gioia's post on it. That was the subject of my post last Sunday The Argument for Aesthetics. In Ted's post he mentions that he got a lot of his information from another source, Music Business Worldwide, which I linked to. In today's miscellanea my quotes are from a third source, Music Industry Blog and if you followed the link you would see it is written by Mark Mulligan. So, three sources. There seems to be quite a lot of buzz about this.

But I'm sure you are correct about the behaviour of your students!

Will Wilkin said...

I spend virtually all my disposable money on music. I average at least a thousand or two thousand dollars annually to luthiers and string makers, about that much more to music teachers, and maybe half that much again on CDs and concert tickets. Virtually all of it oriented around my little taste niche, European music around the 17th century. I've always poured my money into music, usually recordings and concert tickets (and stereo). Streaming to me is truly alien. I even bought a stereo component for streaming because supposedly I have access to the Naxos catalog as a member of the Early Music of America society (I think that's what EMA stands for). But after a few months I still never hooked that streamer up to either of my stereos that have only CD and turntables actually plugged in.

The kids I work with or observe in my extended family...have zero physical artifacts in their musical life, probably hardly even a set of speakers or experience of any collective listening space. Its streaming into earbuds...I can't even gift them a recording, which for decades for me was a standard gift, either LP or CD. And of course I read every word of the thousands of CD booklets and LP covers. Kids today maybe don't think of their music as coming from a certain album made by certain personnel...and yet they will say they love music, so I don't know if the alien feel to me is generational or genre, technological or cultural shift or just different tastes and minds underneath all that momentary circumstantial stuff.

Bryan Townsend said...

We are going through a huge transition in the music world and there is probably lots left to come. I was astonished to discover that there are highly gifted classical musicians who do not own a CD player!! I don't know how you can just have earbuds as your only means of listening to music. I have some really good headphones, but I never even use them.

Wenatchee the Hatchet said...

I've read Gioia for years and "my" gut take is that his new gut take has been building on his earlier work in light of newer coverage.

https://www.thesmartset.com/why-music-ownership-matters/

Agreed, Ethan, a sociologist Ted Gioia is not. Anyone who has slogged through Adorno can guess that Adorno would point out that the shift from mediating music via the commodity fetish of the "object" has changed in the last twenty years to the commodity fetish of music mediated by "subscription". What makes that subscription model troubling is, per Gioia, the extent to which many artists that are available or MADE available (shades of Adorno) to the public are fake artists. So long as the subscriptions get renewed how eagerly will the industry police artists that are fake? Or ... actually ... some more digging into what "fake" means seems important.

More to come, I take it?

Wenatchee the Hatchet said...

One of the reasons I find it useful to compare notes across journalism and scholarship about different styles of music is seeing how fandom is situated in terms of communities, not "just" consumption or production habits. Surely there was muzak in the last century. Muzak in the era of streaming may be creepier in terms of scale but I wonder if it's as revolutionary in quality as some takes on the coverage may conclude. I'm not ready to say three sources constitutes a trend yet.

That's the production side but in my neck of the blogging woods celebrity preachers buying Twitter "fans" via social media baking was something I did a tiny amount of digging into. We've had "fake artists" for generations but if there "is" something different it's that in the era of social media there can be fake "fans", too, like some platoon of bots that hype up figures who may not have as big a following in reality as social media activity might suggest. If celebrity preachers stoop to that I don't know why pop stars, real or "fake" wouldn't do that, too.

Wenatchee the Hatchet said...

Martin's Mass for double choir is a favorite of mine. I might have to see if I can look up that dissertation.

Ethan Hein said...

The technology has certainly changed, but it doesn't follow that it's deterministic of behavior. The kids may not have physical liner notes, but they have something vastly better: Wikipedia, Allmusic, WhoSampled, and the rest of the internet. Back in the dawn of history when I was a kid, few people were interested in who played on the records or who produced them. I was interested, and I pored over liner notes, but I couldn't do that for records and CDs that weren't in my physical possession. It was constantly frustrating. Now the majority of people continue to be incurious about who makes their music, but for those who are curious, they can gratify their curiosity effortlessly. A few years ago I mentioned Billie Holiday to a teenage guitar student, and by the following week he had listened to dozens of her recordings and knew the basics of her life story. Nothing like that was possible when I was a kid. Does streaming discourage or encourage curiosity? I don't see a big net shift either way. It makes passivity easier, but it also makes active knowledge seeking easier too.

Ethan Hein said...

Music industry scams are also not exactly a new phenomenon. Radio payola is as old as radio. The Billboard charts were substantially a fiction until the advent of Soundscan in 1991. Spotify may be a large and malign player that is a safe haven for all kinds of exploitation, but how different is it from the major labels? I met Aerosmith's manager one time and he described the majors in the 60s and 70s as an extension of the mafia. Now they are more corporatized, but not necessarily any more (or less) moral.

Bryan Townsend said...

Ethan, very good points! An excellent counter to the journalistic sensationalism. It is absolutely easier to access all kinds of information about artists and music now than it was before the rise of the internet and streaming services. Mind you, the noise factor is also pretty high, but that was inevitable.

Will Wilkin said...

BTW, I saw that Die Walkure "live" on the big screen as a simulcast that Saturday noon. Before covid I got 2 free tickets to 10 or 12 different Met operas in live simulcast at a local cinema, the tix cost about $25 each but I have a friend.... My son is pretty versed in opera for a 22yo American kid with an electrician dad.

And yeah, that was an AWESOME production! I've seen just a few Wagner operas, always via Met simulcast, always very enjoyable, and never very listenable when I went home and tried to relive it from CD. Unlike Mozart, whose operas pour like honey from stereo speakers without any actors or extravagent scenery or plot necessary.

And as for that commodity fetishism around recordings, it wasn't just the notes but also the artwork itself, rolling joints in some of those 2-record set covers was pretty ethereal, for example the Yes albums with the Roger Dean art....

Will Wilkin said...

And I meant to say that was how many operas each year, not total.. I think it ran about 5 years but now has dried up...Maybe the solution is to buy regular movie tickets at a movie matinee with a similar start time, and then just slip into the wrong theater door for our Met opera. Making me a TERRIBLE art patron.

Bryan Townsend said...

From what you have said previously, I suspect you might be one of the leading patrons on the East Coast!