Alex Ross writes about Elemental Opera at Santa Fe
The chief novelty at Santa Fe this season is a new version of Monteverdi’s “Orfeo,” which, at the age of four hundred and sixteen, is the oldest opera still regularly performed. Although Harry Bicket, Santa Fe’s music director, is a specialist in early opera, he decided against using a period ensemble of harpsichords, theorbos, sackbuts, and the like; this would have required a total reconfiguration of the company’s resident orchestra. Instead, Bicket turned to the composer Nico Muhly, who has refashioned Monteverdi’s masterpiece in a captivating modern guise.
I saw two other operas during my time in Santa Fe: “Pelléas et Mélisande,” directed by Netia Jones, and “The Flying Dutchman,” directed by David Alden. Both stagings tend toward grungy industrial imagery—churning wall fans are a shared element—and both make a somewhat head-scratching impression. Jones places the archaic castle dwellers of “Pelléas” in a bunker rife with signs of disease and delirium: oxygen cannisters are wheeled out, projections of medical data flicker on walls, mysterious doubles appear. Alden, for his part, transposes the maritime denizens of “Dutchman” to a regimented container-shipping milieu. As arresting as the images sometimes are, they get in the way of the operas’ fundamental qualities: Debussy’s eerie radiance, Wagner’s elemental swell.
* * *
It is hard to ignore Taylor Swift these days so here is The dark truth about Taylor Swift.
Beyond the first flush of love, then, lies mostly darkness, longing, and perhaps bittersweet recollection. My takeaway from Swift’s oeuvre is that a happy ending matters less than the sheer romanticness of love elevated by whatever dooms it to destruction, whether that’s the lover, some external circumstance, or the protagonist’s inner demons.
We could just shrug and say well, Swift has been unlucky in love — her fans are as well-versed in her doomed love affairs as they are her lyrics cataloguing them — and she has a knack for singing about this in a way that resonates with a wide audience. But why is this theme of thwarted, exquisitely painful romance so powerful?
Our love-affair with doomed love begins in early 13th-century France with the two-decade Albigensian Crusade which saw the Cathar sect persecuted, tortured, slaughtered and scattered by the orthodox Christian Knights Templar, leading to the deaths of an estimated 200,000.
You gotta love a writer who can tie Taylor Swift to the Albigensian Crusade...
* * *
The Times Higher Education offers this: Music departments should resist the siren song of pop schools
As in other artistic fields, the modest but realisable aim of producing rigorous studies of musical, literary, cinematic or other texts – or their relationship to historical context – is often viewed as trivial compared with making major pronouncements on society, culture, globalisation, colonialism and more. Those claiming to be doing the latter often offer harsh verdicts on those doing the former.
But the chances of academic writings of this type from the arts having any significant social impact are extremely low, and this has contributed to the increasing bifurcation of scholarly and practical study. So, too, have the 1992 Further and Higher Education Act, the introduction of tuition fees and other moves towards greater marketisation. In such an environment, a range of post-1992 institutions introduced vocationally oriented degrees in music technology and commercial music performance, which would not always have previously been classified as degrees.
Furthermore, the progressive marginalisation of the study of music theory and analysis, relentlessly dismissed as “formalism”, deprives music departments of the one thing, other than practical work, that is not undertaken (often more rigorously) by other disciplines.
The whole thing is worth reading, though you will have to register to access.
* * *
From The Guardian: ‘I compose to seek the truth’: György Kurtág on depression, totalitarianism and his 73-year marriage
Kurtág is the last survivor of an outstanding generation of postwar avant garde composers that includes Boulez, Stockhausen and Nono, but he emphasises how important Hungarian composers Bartók and Kodály also were to both him and Ligeti. While Kurtág largely stayed in Communist Hungary, Ligeti escaped and settled in western Europe, though the two managed to remain closely connected.
* * *
And: ‘It’s vastly complex, even dangerous’: in defence of the recorder, the Marmite of the woodwind world
At the heart of the recent headline flurries lies a much deeper story about the future of music in schools in the face of successive funding cuts. Added to this, a Covid crisis that has dissuaded many children from picking up shared classroom instruments. It’s not just a crisis affecting the recorder: the numbers have dropped for woodwinds in general. “There was a time when you couldn’t turn around without bumping into a flute and clarinet,” says Nallen. Now they’re being taught privately. Perhaps what has fuelled the crisis for recorders more specifically is its ubiquity – which has fostered a kind of devaluation as a result. “Being cheap is a double-edge sword,” Nallen says. Yes, it makes the recorder accessible, but it can also be taken for granted, “because you can just throw it into a cupboard drawer.”
“it’s a vastly complex instrument,” says Sarah Jeffery. “It’s even a little bit dangerous”, she adds with a smile, “because every little move you make can be heard.” My first encounter with Jeffery, a classically-trained recorder player and educator, was via her YouTube channel Team Recorder, a platform where she publishes weekly tutorials on all aspects of playing and music-making.
I had a virtuoso recorder player as a close friend for many years. Once, visiting his basement studio, I looked around in bemusement as it was filled with open shelving on which resided an immense collection of recorders. I asked him how many he had and he replied, "I'm not really sure, but I have twelve working altos..."
* * *
From Gramophone: The art of the song recital
More than ever, vocal recitals arrive with a mission: dispelling pandemic isolation, endorsing social justice and, as ever, fostering reappreciation and rediscovery of great music touched by the voice.
Requiring only a fraction of opera-performance machinery, vocal recitals aren’t simply star singers working solo. This highly specific medium morphs every which way, with new outspoken repertoire, an influx of vocal talent from the early-music community and liberated performance manner. Yet art song maintains its identity – as pianistic as it is vocal, as literary as it is musical, with all elements fusing into a place where audiences better know the artists, the art and even themselves. No scenery. No costumes. No barriers between artists and audience.
That's all true and the lengthy article gives a detailed picture of what is happening with art-song performance worldwide. But I have misgivings. I suspect the picture is not as rosy as it seems. Where I live, for example, the chamber music society brings in pianists, violinists, cellists and string quartets every season but never a song recital. Never. Once a year they feature finalists in an opera competition, but that is rather different. I wonder how the art song is doing outside of major urban centers...
* * *
Here is a review of a song recital at Salzburg: An evening with Rachmaninoff
Asmik Grigorian is a formidable singer—in technique, in voice, and in musical intelligence. She gave her heart to the Rachmaninoff songs, but also her head. She could be relatively cool. But then, so can the songs. She was not a wallower. But neither did she stint on emotion.
She produces a steady stream of sound. She can sing loud—very loud; high and loud; penetratingly loud—without stridency. Without any stridency at all. Mind you, stridency may come later. But it has not arrived yet.
After Grigorian had sung four songs, Geniušas sat down for three solo pieces. All of a sudden, the voice recital was a piano recital. This was slightly strange, but there are no hard-and-fast rules.
Geniušas played three pieces that Rachmaninoff himself played—that he, in fact, recorded. First came the composer’s transcription of his song “Daisies.” Then came his transcription of a hopak (a Ukrainian folk dance) by Mussorgsky. Third came his transcription of Rimsky-Korsakov’s winner The Flight of the Bumblebee.
* * *
Easy choices for envois this week. First up, Monteverdi, of course, a performance from the Trigonale Festival:
Next, Taylor Swift, "Love Story"
György Kurtág, Eight Piano Pieces op. 3:
A Vivaldi recorder concerto:
Finally, the first song from Schumann's Dichterliebe:
The recorder is such a beautiful instrument. I often feel tempted to sell my spare guitar and buy a good alto recorder. When I have played recorders briefly in the past, I loved the feel of my breath vibrating through the body of the instrument, and then the sound is so pure and expressive. I particularly love Bach's cantata 'Actus Tragicus' with its two recorders.
ReplyDeleteI wondered if you might include that Guardian article about Kurtag. Reading it yesterday made me hop on the train last minute to go the performance of the opera the article was essentially promoting. And promotion it needed as the Albert Hall was not even half full, I don't think. (Which was great for me: if there is ever a Proms performance that is very poorly sold, book the cheapest ticket you can find and when you get there a steward will give you a free upgrade to the best seats in the hall. It's a superb wheeze.) I'd never heard any Kurtag before and came aware quite impressed by his spare, intense style and clever textures -- I want to explore his other works -- but as an opera it was painfully slow. Only four characters, two of which disappear into their dustbins early on (I mean this literally; they were an elderly couple who each lived in their own dustbin), and much of the libretto was just monologue. Perhaps some of the problem lies with Beckett (the opera is based on his play Endgame), whose bleak imagination doesn't interest me. My fault, probably. Lots of people walked out over the course of the performance, which was a shame. Others were talking very enthusiastically about it afterward. For me it was a fascinating and special performance, even though it was also trying..! Actually, it was one of the few interesting premieres at this year's Proms (so far).
Regarding Taylor Swift. A lot of people think happy music is cheesy, while sad music is cool. Pharrell Williams’ “Happy” is cheesy, while Radiohead’s “Creep” is cool. That sort of thing.
ReplyDeleteThe same feeling is present in classical music. Purcell’s funeral music for Queen Mary is loved more than his welcome music for James II. Bach’s Matthew Passion is loved more than his Christmas Oratorio.
Although it can be risky to equate major keys with “happy” and minor keys with “sad”, there’s often a crude correspondence. I think Mozart wrote significantly more major key music than minor key music. And yet it’s the minor key music we often feel is the deepest: the Lacrimosa from the Requiem, the 40th Symphony, the slow movement of the A major Piano Concerto. I particularly love the A minor rondo for piano, which seems to anticipate Chopin.
I know this preference for gloom colours my own reaction to music. It’s not rational, but art appreciation never is. I’m one of a small group of curmudgeonly grumps who can’t really enjoy Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy”. It’s too irritatingly positive, dammit. I think Stanley Kubrick was right to see something sinister in it!
Sorry in advance to anyone who loves it.
Thanks, Steven, for the opera review! I had similar thoughts after seeing the Salzburg production of Feldman's Neither, also based on a libretto by Beckett. Long and tedious with a conspicuous lack of drama.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if the happy/cheesy sad/cool associations are not partly age related. When I was a young person I felt those connections very strongly. If music wasn't dark and tormented then it wasn't serious. Happy music was inherently trivial. But later in my life this went away and now I relate very well to some of the most major key "happy" music by Haydn, Mozart and others. The last movement of the Jupiter symphony by Mozart is about as good as music gets and it is solidly major. Music that aims for minor key sadness can come across as wallowing in needless sorrow.
Ah, I belong to the same 'small group of curmudgeonly grumps', georgesdelatour. Though probably for different reasons; I don't have any prejudice against 'happy' music, I don't think. Several years ago Jay Nordlinger wrote invited readers to answer the question, 'what is the worst major piece of music ever written by a great composer?' I was younger then and thus even more insufferable than I am now, but he nevertheless published my response, and I think I still agree with the content of it:
ReplyDelete'The answer is undoubtedly Beethoven’s Symphony No. 9. No, it’s not because of the sanctimonious use of the “Ode to Joy” as a universalist hymn. It’s because the blasted thing is way too long and unwieldy. I agree with Verdi: the first movement is easily the best, the next two are very good, but if only it stopped there. Oh, if only he hadn’t written that blasted final movement with its series of frantic and melodramatic variations on the “Ode to Joy” theme. It is stirring for about thirty seconds, then incredibly tedious for the next twenty minutes.'
I have written before that I am also in the group of 9th Symphony curmudgeons. Whatever possessed Beethoven to write a cantata for a final movement?
ReplyDeletewell for guitarists the must-hear Kurtag is The Little Predicament op. 15b. I have David Starobin's recording of this charming piece of chamber music and I also snagged the score (that was quite a more difficult feat!).
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKygWA4n_ZQ
The guitar doesn't show up until movement 2
I actually kinda hate Radiohead and can tune out Swift. She's not a bad writer of pop songs and I'd take her over any number of aggravating four-chord soul bros I've heard in the last five years.
I think the worst music William Byrd wrote on his worst day is better than anything and everything choral Beethoven wrote. His choral music is just kinda dreadful. By contrast I genuinely like Haydn's oratorios and masses but as my old choir director in college put it, Haydn actually sang in church choirs and for those who can't stand choral music from the Classical period Haydn and Mozart are the best, or the best of the worst for people more steeped in English, French and Russian choral music and for Lutherans who prefer Schutz and Bach to Beethoven.
I love Beethoven's Op. 111 and his late string quartets have all sorts of great things about them ... it's just Beethoven bungled choral music. There are just so many better options than Missa Solemnis. Why would I sit through Missa Solemnis when I'd rather her Kodaly's Missa Brevis?
I've set aside a chamber sonata for tenor recorder and guitar I started a few years ago. I might have to get back to it. I can't perform it myself because I'd obviously need a recorder--but the idea was to take a verse-chorus module from my old rock band days and make that Theme 1 and then have Theme 2 be a bridge from another song idea and have that lead back to Theme 1. One of the things William Caplin pointed out is that in slow sonatas there are no transitions. Something James Hepokoski pointed out is that Rossini did "Type 1" sonatas where there's an exposition and a recapitulation but no actual development. A rock/pop approach to sonata form would be pretty simple building on these two conceits--you have a verse-chorus in, say, A minor as Theme 1 and Theme 2 can be something in C major but it could easily start with a IV-I alternation pattern a la some David Bowie or Bob Dylan song and the Theme 2 could mutate into a transition back into the A minor verse-chorus module--naturally the bridge that appeared in C could appear in A as a way to have what Yoel Greenberg called the sonata form's "end rhyme".
ReplyDeleteWe live in an era in which the boundaries between "high" and "low couldn't get any more permeable for those who want to view them and hear them as permeable. So even though I've actually liked reading Ian Pace over the years and can even sympathize with his concerns about the hegemonic influence of Anglo-American pop music he still seems ... I dunno ... a bit too beholden to Adorno style views for me to be entirely on board with him.
But then I also try to keep in mind he's writing in the UK about UK concerns and folks in the US and elsewhere are likely to differ. I've read enough Adorno to know that even HE granted that in earlier eras of music there was more synergistic give and take between "art" and "pop" than has happened since the 19th century theories on form and substance got developed.
I'm early into Ewell's book and, honestly, I'm actually enjoying it. I suspect I'll find stuff to disagree with but when Ewell takes aim at the long 19th century's Germanophile art-religion I don't really see why the Lebrechts of the world should be so ticked off ... oh wait ... for Beethoven's 9th wprshipper's you can't actually say Beethoven was a better than average composer and leave it at that. ;)
I used to have a terrific CD of David Starobin doing a bunch of 20th century guitar music--what a treasure that was. Thanks for the Kurtag clip, I wasn't aware that he had written for guitar.
ReplyDeleteI dislike Radiohead myself, but I'm not sure if it is sentiment or judgement!
I said to a rather conventionally minded music aficionado once that Beethoven never wrote very well for the voice and he just looked at me in horror.
As for boundaries, yes, from a composer's point of view they have largely disappeared, but pop culture seems rather sealed off from outside influences, wouldn't you say? Nothing must be allowed to interfere with the commercial enterprise of music.