"Moment Form" is one of the more interesting musical experiments of the 20th century. It is worth reading the Wikipedia article. The inventor of 'moment form' was Karlheinz Stockhausen whom I had the pleasure of meeting in Salzburg in 1988 when he brought his ensemble to the Salzburg Festival and gave a week of performances of his chamber music. I didn't discuss moment form with him, but rather how he incorporates theatrical elements into his chamber music. Stockhausen distinguishes between different kinds of form: moment form, strictly speaking, is a "mosaic of moments" each moment being a self-contained section. "Moment-forming" is a way of writing music that avoids narrative arc, in which the music, one might say, "lives in the now" and is not directed towards a goal. A different kind of form is what Stockhausen calls 'polyvalent' in which the components of the structure can be ordered in different ways. Others have called this kind of form a 'mobile' as the different elements are in a free relationship. Composers have been using these and related ideas to write music since the late 1950s.
One thing the different approaches have in common is that no two performances can ever be the same. This has appealed to a lot of composers and performers as it seems to free us from the horrible Procrustean bed of recording technology where, as soon as a performance is recorded it becomes frozen for all time--a very unmusical thing!
Let's listen to some examples. Here is the piece that originated moment form, Momente, written in various versions between 1962 and 1969:
Though it may seem as if there is a direction, an overall structure, that is really not how it works. There are different kinds of moments, or modular components, and different performances use different collections of them, in different orderings.
In the 1980s Anthony Genge, a Canadian composer I knew quite well and had worked with on several occasions, gave me the score to a new piece called Night Rain for alto flute and guitar. There were three 'movements'. Each movement was written on a single sheet of score. The alto flute part occupied the top half of the page and the guitar part, the bottom. Each part consisted of a number of measures of music, but each measure was a separate section and the measures could be played in any order. There were no indications of coordination between the flute and guitar. So, a musical mobile or, perhaps also moment form? The flute player that I performed this with, Richard Volet, and I noticed that there were certain recurring elements. For example, one brief melodic cell, three notes rising and falling, occurs a few times in the flute part and also comes in the guitar part. As Richard and I rehearsed the piece together we discovered that the usual issues of ensemble were simply irrelevant. We never needed to coordinate beats or dynamics or phrasing. Each part was independent. We did discover that we needed to know when each movement began and ended. But we developed no obvious signals to coordinate this. We just kept playing the piece and pretty soon we knew what the other player was doing and when the movement was over.
After we had played it for a while and performed it in concert a few times, the composer asked us to record it for him, which we were happy to do. We had gotten pretty good at it and recorded it in a single take, which took both Tony and the recording engineer quite by surprise. They had settled in for a nice long chat in the control room and we were done! Here is that recording with some photos of the west coast of Canada that seemed appropriate:
I have included right after the titles a photo of the composer, Anthony Genge and a photo of myself at the very end, but I was not able to find a photo of Richard Volet. Apologies!
HEllo Bryan. Having just read your comments about Tony Genge's Night Rain and our performances and recording of it, I thought I would add a brief word. Yes, we recorded it in one take, on tape. Gone are those kind of recordings!
ReplyDeleteI still love this piece of Tony's and have always wondered about how it works. Obviously Tony composed the fragments so they would fit together..somehow. I've wondered, could there be "good and "bad" performances, aside from obvious technical things? I used to love performing the piece because I felt as if I was an improviser (Tony is a first rate jazz musician). It seemed to me that the performer's choice of which fragment to play was based on his reaction to the other player's choices, and that the exact timing,placement, phrasing and timbre had to be "felt" in relation to the other part as well. If these choices were all sensitively made on the spot, and successfully executed, then you had a good performance. I saw it very much as a Zen performance; one had to be in that kind of state. However, maybe Tony's composition was just so good that no matter what you did, you couldn't go wrong!
Richard Volet
Richard, how great to hear from you! I was just watching a Victoria Symphony video the other day and noticed your familiar face. I feel exactly the same about this piece and, in fact, for the first time in my career, wrote a similar passage in a new piece of mine. This was for violin and guitar and I had eight cells for each instrument and all that was repeated (different the second time, of course), then there was a brief coda consisting of a new cell for each instrument. The aleatory section actually functions as a kind of development in the piece and uses little fragments from the rest of the piece.
ReplyDeleteI used to have your email, but it seems to have disappeared. Mine is bryantown@gmail.com. Send me an email and I will send you the aleatory section from my piece, Dark Dream. I just got back from Toronto where I recorded it with this terrific violinist, Valerie Li.
Are you still in touch with Tony Genge?