Sunday, October 20, 2019

Intermittent Blogging

I feel a bit like California's PGE utility company who said yesterday that the blackouts could continue for another decade. Does anyone else find that almost incomprehensible given that California is home to the highest technology on earth? As I was saying, I feel a bit like PGE because my blog has been dark all too often lately--in the past week I have only managed two posts, the Friday Miscellanea and a brief one on decorative rosettes on guitars and lutes. Heck, I used to do double that in a single day.

When I started this blog, eight years ago, I had a lot of pent-up stuff to say. Teaching music can be grueling, but it is also a satisfying outlet for creative thought and after a few years of doing almost no teaching, I found I had a lot to say. These days the impulse to instruct is less intense and besides, I have talked about a lot of the most interesting stuff already and the more boring stuff is, well, boring. Plus, as I edge more and more into my role as composer, I find that I no longer want to simply pass on the half and semi-truths that are commonly expressed in music classes. In the immortal words of Kanye West, "First rule in this world, baby, don't pay attention to anything you see in the news."

Yes, of course, in the more refined circles of classical music education and criticism, the falsehoods are considerably less blatant (there being so much less at stake, or is there?), but they are still present. For example, a couple of things about Schoenberg that are widely believed, but quite untrue. His Verklärte Nacht was not the first piece to have a minor ninth chord in last inversion in a prominent place. Beethoven, in the introduction to the last movement of his Quartet, op 18, no 6, also uses that harmony. A much more major error is the often-expressed view that Schoenberg wrote "atonal" music. Actually, everything he wrote, including his later twelve-tone pieces, was tonally organized in various ways. His so-called early "atonal" music shows characteristics of tonal attraction and resolution and in his serial compositions he often sets up analogues to traditional tonal organization, but using different transpositions of the original row as stand-ins or developments of different chords or harmonies.

Another kind of misapprehension  was in the Wall Street Journal this week in a piece titled The History of Song Is All About Outsiders.
Innovative songs almost always come from outsiders—the poor, the unruly and the marginalized.
The scholars Milman Parry and Albert Lord confirmed this fact in the 1930s, when they set out to trace the origins of ancient epics like the Iliad and the Odyssey. Their research took them to Bosnia, where they met Avdo Mededović, an illiterate peasant farmer they dubbed the “Yugoslav Homer.” Accompanying himself on a one-string instrument, Mededović performed a single story-song that took seven days to complete and went on for 12,311 lines—roughly the same length as the Odyssey. He performed entirely from memory, aided by patterned improvisations of the kind used by jazz musicians.
Parry and Lord later declared that every one of the great singers of tales they encountered during their field research was illiterate. The ability to sing an epic poem was not only a skill that couldn’t be taught in college, but a formal education would almost certainly destroy it.
Now of course there is a grain of truth there. It is indeed true that one of the basic functions of music schools, even if not recognized as such, is to crush genuine creative originality. But while a great deal of innovation tends to come from outside the usual sources, simply being an outsider is neither necessary nor sufficient. You mustn't forget that genuine creativity is very rare and almost all those outsiders have nothing to offer. You could spend a great deal of effort sorting through outsiders before you found a crumb of talent. So another important function of music institutions is to offer a place where a talented outsider can come to tap into the traditions and practices that are essential to being able to shape inspiration into a form that can be transmitted.

Also, who is and isn't an outsider is definitely a matter of perspective. I can guarantee that their Yugoslav Homer came out of a long-standing oral tradition, just as the original Homer did. And Bob Dylan, with all his innovative ideas, has always been thickly interwoven with the whole tradition of American popular song, from Depression ballads to homespun country. Here's an example:


Even a famously eccentric outsider like Harry Partch is only an outsider from a certain perspective. He did everything he could to overturn the basic principles of tuning used in the 20th century mainstream, and he did it by going back to a far more ancient tradition deriving from ancient Greece.

A great deal of creative innovation turns out to be creative primitivism as the artist seeks out some deep wellsprings in his soul. Where do creative ideas come from? Let's ask Leonard Cohen. This is from an acceptance speech he gave on being given an honor by the King of Spain:
"Poetry comes from a place that no one commands, that no one conquers. So I feel somewhat like a charlatan to accept an award for an activity which I do not command. In other words, if I knew where the good songs came from I would go there more often." 

9 comments:

Wenatchee the Hatchet said...

I knew it was going to be Gioia, whose new book claiming to be a "subversive history" of music could not be more conventionally early 21st century American.

Bob Dylan, for all his influence, has also been consistent accused of plagiarism. A few authors over the last decade and a half have claimed, and backed up, allegations that Dylan lifted material. One of my music professors told me he never had an issue with Bob Dylan's voice but with his taking credit for other people's songs. Perhaps my professor didn't know Dylan wrote songs that other people covered, but hasn't Joni Mitchell been pretty insistent that Dylan, however much she likes him as a person, has been stealing songs for a while?

The death of Ben Johnston is a reminder that however marginal Partsch was supposed to be one of his proteges was described as the best least-known American composer earlier this year. A composer whose most famous protege is Johnston can't be "that" marginal.

I've seen a more compelling alternative to the rote "outsider" mythology Gioia has written. The argument goes like this, innovation isn't actually done by outsiders as much as by marginal insiders. They're "inside" enough to have an accurate take on trends for their time and place but also not so in the spotlight they have no time to do innovative work. That could be a way to describe J.S. Bach, who was not the most popular or sought after composer of his day but ... Gioia has to rewrite Bach so as to be a "rebel".

https://www.laphamsquarterly.org/roundtable/js-bach-rebel

The trouble is that, along the way to making a not very persuasive case that a Lutheran behaved like a rock star of the 1950s, Gioia claims that Scott Joplin was looked on as some rabble-rouser or dangerous influence. No scholarly work on ragtime backs this up, quite the opposite. Edward A. Berlin's work on Joplin is probably "the" standard biography on the composer and he's pointed out that because early ragtime was generally a genre of song and the lyrics were probably best compared to rap (i.e. coon songs, i.e. Ethan Hein and I have had some fun comparing notes on how early 20th century anti-rag sentiments were not unlike anti-rap polemics) the genre was viewed as garbage by respectable society. Gioia has JUST that part right, but the problem is that Scott Joplin was reserved, well-spoken, and respectable. People who regarded ragtime as a genre as terrible had good things to say about Scott Joplin as a person and even expressed some hope that if this musical trash genre were going to be elevated to the level of art Scott Joplin could do it.

Very clearly Joplin did do that.

Anonymous said...

"Also, who is and isn't an outsider is definitely a matter of perspective. I can guarantee that their Yugoslav Homer came out of a long-standing oral tradition, just as the original Homer did."

There has been a great deal of scholarship on the fact that the “original Homer”, and all the other bards before him, were outsiders. They were likely itinerant performers, which in Ancient Greece meant low on the socioeconomic hierarchy and bereft of close ties and protection from a community. Cf. Roma musicians in more recent centuries, who come out of a long-standing tradition of their own but are little esteemed by the surrounding society except for their music.

Bryan Townsend said...

Ah, I have a feeling that this is one of those posts that is going to attract a LOT of comments. Thanks Wenatchee for providing some good supporting examples. I particularly like the phrase (and the concept) of "marginal insider." I think that captures it pretty well.

Also thanks to Anonymous for offering a good critique. I wish we could identify our different Anonymouses as in one comment thread we had two different ones with very different opinions. If you want to be Anonymous, why not be Anonymous IV or something?

Wenatchee the Hatchet said...

since I was planning on blogging about Gioia on Bach anyway ...

https://wenatcheethehatchet.blogspot.com/2019/10/conventional-wisdom-from-ted-gioia-with.html

Bryan Townsend said...

Oh no, poor Ted! Getting it from both of us.

Wenatchee the Hatchet said...

He's written some stuff I really like, such as his argument a few years back that most of what passes for music journalism is just lifestyle reporting. The unfortunate reality that most of what gets published in music journalism doesn't involve score-reading musical literacy is a point worth mentioning so I'm glad Gioia did that.

Which makes it all the more inexcusable that his approach to music history seems to have devolved into lifestyle reporting. Someone like Daniel Melamed (who I blogged about in a very recent post) can make a case that Bach's significance for us can be seen in the way he synthesized the old and new style of his time and place into a compelling and successful musical synthesist. Bach could be regarded as one of the master synthesists in the history of Western music, to use your term. That makes his life and work mighty worthy of study. Gioia's "subversive" history doesn't promise to give us much insight into how that kind of synthesizing work can happen.

I'm sure Gioia won't feel the least bit hurt that the likes of us regard his approach to music history as sloppy, misleading and irresponsible. :)

Bryan Townsend said...

He wrote that? "most of what passes for music journalism is just lifestyle reporting" Yes, that's a great observation. As is your application of the same criticism to his approach to music history.

Heh, heh, heh!

Marc in Eugene said...

Very interesting post and comments; thank you!

Gioia's article headlined 'music criticism has degenerated into lifestyle reporting' is <a href="https://www.thedailybeast.com/music-criticism-has-degenerated-into-lifestyle-reporting>here</a>, the Daily Beast of all places, five years ago!

Bryan Townsend said...

Thanks for tracking down that link, Marc. Now I have to go read it.