Friday, July 12, 2024

Friday Miscellanea

The future is made through relinquishing or sacrificing the past.
--Asger Jorn, once member of the Situationist International

* * *

Every week I struggle to find interesting and entertaining musical items and try to avoid politics, obituaries and too much doom-saying. It's not easy! The New York Times helps this week with this piece about Gluck: The Composer Who Changed Opera With ‘a Beautiful Simplicity’

Today, Gluck suffers a little from a reputation for formality, even stodginess. But with the period instrument ensemble Le Concert d’Astrée conducted gracefully yet energetically by Emmanuelle Haïm, the Aix double bill was a reminder of the vibrancy of his vision, a majestic yet vigorous directness.

This rare juxtaposition offers an immersion in Gluck’s revolutionary innovations — what became known as his reform of opera, paving the way for Wagner and modernity. By the middle of the 18th century, bloated extravagance was the mainstream of Italian opera, dominated by singers burbling mindless coloratura in an endless parade of arias that barely held together as narrative.

Gluck wrote in 1769 that these abuses had “turned the most sumptuous and beautiful of all spectacles into the most ridiculous and tedious.” To counter this, his aim was “to restrict music to its true function of helping poetry to be expressive and to represent the situations of the plot” — to seek “a beautiful simplicity.”

One of the most exciting developments in French music for the last few decades has been the successful revival of French opera from the 18th century.

* * *

On An Overgrown Path thoughtfully considers that Great music has no independent existence

Changing the music in nuanced ways does not necessarily mean rappers with symphony orchestras. The Amsterdam Sinfonietta's excellent The Mahler Album also includes Mahler's arrangement of Beethoven's String Quartet no. 11 and an intensely moving arrangement for string orchestra of the Adagio from Mahler's Tenth Symphony. On other discs the Amsterdam Sinfonietta under artistic director Candida Thompson has recorded arrangements of two other Beethoven quartets, Shostakovich's Second and Fourth Quartets, Wagner's Tristan Prelude, and Berg's Sonata Opus 1. 

Although not as dramatic as Stokowski's Bach transcriptions these interpretations, particularly the quartet transcriptions with their added bass lines, made even this jaded classical nerd hear these masterworks with fresh ears. And in an expression of diversity that goes beyond classical's current myopic and tired obsession with gender diversity, the Amsterdam Sinfonietta is presenting in concert Philip Glass in India pairing Glass' Violin Concerto no. 2 “The Four American Seasons” with Indian ragas. All these are worthwhile case studies in changing the music without throwing baby integrity out with the bath water. (Incidentally, no personal connection with or free CDs and concert tickets, or - heaven forbid - alone payola, from the Amsterdam Sinfonietta, I just happen to be inspired by their work and buy their CDs.)

* * *

From the New York Times: The Nearly Lost Work of a ‘Born Opera Composer’ Returns

Only one copy of “Anna” survives today, housed in the vast collection of the Naples Conservatory. It takes time to read an opera from a manuscript orchestral score. You have to decipher the calligraphy before you can start imagining the sounds, and this one is a particularly hasty job, full of errors and none too clear. But as I picked my way through it, appreciation gradually turned to admiration and eventually to outright amazement. This was the work of a born opera composer. This was the real thing.

Here is one way of putting it. Bel canto operas are structured in individual numbers — cavatina, duet, finale and so forth — and “Anna” is made of 12 such numbers. Not a single one is boring; not one sounds like padding, not one fails to embody and advance the story, not one falls in the wrong place. The 20-something beginner had a master’s grasp of opera as drama.

* * *

While U.S. Companies Struggle, German Opera Houses Move Ahead Ambitiously

Since their closure in 2020 due to the coronavirus, American opera houses have been struggling to regain their financial footing—and their audiences. Most have reduced the number of performances they give and retreated to a repertoire of safe favorites. However, the Metropolitan Opera has taken a different tact by embracing untried contemporary works it hopes will appeal to younger, more diverse audiences. Recently released attendance data suggests that this Met initiative might not be working.

Bolstered by significant governmental support, European companies mostly appear to have returned to a pre-pandemic status quo. A recent visit to Germany found both the Hamburg and Berlin Staatsopers fearlessly mounting challenging operas of questionable popular appeal, but both Olivier Messiaen’s Saint François d’Assise and Modest Mussorgsky’s Chowanschtschina (better known in the U.S. as Khovanshchina) proved to be singular artistic and reasonably popular successes.

I've long been saying that the so-called "crisis" in classical music is mostly a North American phenomenon--things are very different in Europe.

* * *

I am planning on doing a post devoted to Leonard B. Meyer, but this was not the week for that! Coming soon, I hope. The theme this week seems to be opera, so let's listen to some. First up, a Venetian production of Gluck's Orfeo ed Euridice.

 Next Mussorgsky's Khovanshchina:

Finally Messiaen's Saint Francis of Assisi:

That should keep you occupied for the weekend!

10 comments:

Maury said...

Re: the Met etc

The reason for very limited public funding of classical (or jazz) in the US is not due to reluctance to expend public funds per se. After all the budget has spending on just about everything else one way or the other. The issue is the lack of public support (even tacit) for the high arts and the obviousness that popular arts are doing quite well thank you. There is a somewhat related reluctance in the UK which also has a strong popular art tradition although not to the same degree.

The Met is built for grand opera and big stars so the idea that it is going to alternate with experimental or even more standard contemporary opera no matter how "diverse" is only due to the bizarro brainiacs running the arts in the US. Some theaters have smaller spaces for such kinds of non-meat and potatoes repertoire but again I fail to see how the Met can do that easily.

The Met would have more luck I think if they intelligently tried resurrecting operas using star performers from the so-called Unsung composers (unsungs meaning forgotten or now rarely played). One obvious candidate would be Goldmark's Die Koenigen von Saba (Queen of Sheba), but there are others. This is how the bel canto period was restored to the mainstream (and even the Met) using singers like Callas and Sutherland. There are also a dozen fine Romantic French operas by Massenet other than Werther and Manon, not to mention Lalo, Chabrier etc. One could also mention the neo Wagnerians in the pre WW1 period. In addition they need to get better conductors and productions. Back in their heyday the likes of Toscanini, Mitropolous, Reiner, Szell etc held the reins. Of course they will never do anything that sensible.

Bryan Townsend said...

Yes, your analysis is likely correct. The problem is, if arts funding depends on government, then it becomes, ipso facto, a political decision, not an aesthetic one. At least under the ancien regime, the decisions were somewhat more aesthetic as they were based on the tastes of the nobility. There was a smaller opera company in New York, I forget the name, that went bankrupt a few years ago. They were where you could go for more out-of-the-ordinary opera productions.

The main sponsor of the Salzburg festival is Audi and a lot of other big companies also participate. Wasn't Texaco a big sponsor of the Met in the old days?

Maury said...

In Europe the government funding of the arts is still more in a neo aristocratic or laissez faire manner so it is not as malign as the Soviet Union was. The worst of it is the notorious bureaucracies in Vienna and Paris etc that make productions difficult. Here in the US, performers and small non-profits can get some limited funding but it is so modest that it only supplements rather than sustains.

You are referring to the NY Opera which was a bit more adventurous. It seems to me with their demise the Met could sprinkle their repertoire with those kinds of works and some others if they had first rate conductors and productions (which they mostly don't at present). I think the Met more recently has had the Toll Brothers as a sponsor (recently replaced by the R K Johnson Foundation in Las Vegas!) but yes the PBS/NPR organization has all kinds of corporate sponsors after their public funding was reduced. There really isn't a lack of money at bottom, it's more the limited and shrinking audience that is causing increasing difficulty at all levels. As you noted the Americas really do have a crisis in the classical arts since the pandemic. But the arts managers here are making a bad situation so much worse I think it could collapse with the next shock whether economic or military conflict.

Maury said...

I should have noted The NYC Opera went under in 2013 but was revived a few years later with new mgt. and they are still active in some revised way, not totally defunct. Other US regional opera companies are going under too. Just recently the NY Metropolitan Guild that publishes Opera News went under. The UK Opera Magazine soldiers on but I stopped at 2010 with them. It's not that they are suddenly bad but that the opera scene even in Europe is so stultified that they were having increasing difficulty writing about it in any interesting fashion and were going more into personality stories.

Steven said...

Someone did a score video of the whole of Messiaen's St Francis -- one of my favourite things on YouTube. Such a phenomenal score. Taruskin wrote an account of seeing the opera live, and I like his line about how Messiaen is 'supremely sophisticated in technique yet naively direct in expression as only a believer could be'. Taruskin marvelled at how the opera manages to avoid kitsch.

Somehow I've heard almost no Gluck. Must rectify this. Clearly very good music! Was reading recently about how Berlioz idolised him.

Maury said...

Steven
did you ever see that Vivaldi opera you mentioned some months ago?

Steven said...

No, afraid not. Sadly, as I heard it was rather good!

Maury said...

Sorry you missed it. In my experience Baroque opera is now performed the best by the cast top to bottom so I wouldn't doubt the reports. 19th C opera is now very erratically performed with a star or two and iffy or generic singing from the rest of the cast. With 20th C opera, apart from the carryovers like Puccini and Richard Strauss, it's hard to know since there isn't much performance tradition for them.

Steven said...

Interesting. With 19th century operas one or two singers often stand out as significantly better than everyone else; I hadn't realised it was historically different? I don't get to enough Baroque opera to comment, but contemporary operas often have very good casts.

Maury said...

Steven,

Yes in the past it was the reverse. Baroque opera had a star or two with mediocre at best support, apart from the historical or ahistorical performance style used while 19th C casts were very good all through. But you would have to listen to older recordings from the 50s and early 60s at the latest, probably 1962 or so. If you are not too put off by Wagner, listen to a bit of the Furtwangler or Clemens Krauss Ring cycles of the 50s compared to modern performances. Nothing is barked or strangulated, everyone in the cast sings their part. With respect to more modern style operas, no matter the cast, without a significant performance tradition it is harder to evaluate whether the performance is really excellent or not.